![]() |
XXY Perspectives |
|---|---|
|
This letter was originally posted on the XXYNOY September 2, 1999.
Dr. Robinson is the only doctor with his team in the US who has done a karyotyping and a longitudinal study of children born with sex chromosomal anomalies. He is in Colorado. I quote from the NIH pamphlet on "A Guide for XXY Males and their Families": "I never refer to newborn babies as having Klinefelter's, because they don't have a syndrome," said Arthur Robinson, M.D., a pediatrician at the University of Colorado Medical School in Denver and the director of the NICHD-sponsored study of XXYs. "Presumably, some of them will grow up to develop the syndrome Dr. Klinefelter described, but a lot of them won't." Klinefelter syndrome is a specific form of male hypogonadism, an endocrine disease that is the result of insufficient testosterone. There are even a few cases of men with Klinefelter syndrome who are XY in the literature. XXY (or variants) is the chromosomal anomaly the boys are born with. There is no way a prepubertal male can have Klinefelter syndrome as this specific syndrome can only occur in puberty. XXYs, because of the small testes most have (My son is a mosaic and he does not have these. In fact, we are learning not all XXYs have abnormally small testes.), are at risk to develop Klinefelter syndrome. We also know XXYs are at risk for a list of other diseases, syndromes, and conditions. But not all will develop any or all of these syndromes, etc.
Klinefelter syndrome is a particular syndrome. Because it is the one most frequently dxed and because in the earliest studies after karyotyping was done the men in the studies were all XXY males, the name for XXYs became to be known as Klinefelter syndrome. Yet, in the 1960s there was an international agreement made by geneticists to identify chromosomal anomalies by their chromosomes and not after the names of any diseases named for the researchers who discovered the diseases found in those with the anomalies. We are now seeing a major shift in genetic terminology. It is no longer preferred to refer to Trisomy 21 as Down's syndrome. One reason is a lot of advancement in interventions and treatments have brought us to the point where not all people with Trisomy 21 develop enough features of Down's syndrome to be considered as having the syndrome. There is now a major push to identify anomalies by the chromosomal arrangements instead of any of the possible resulting diseases and conditions. This is important for insurance. Many insurance companies will deny a baby or young child insurance when they see the dx of Klinefelter syndrome. Yet, when we work with these families and doctors, helping them to understand that what they are reading about Klinefelter syndrome may never happen, and that the baby or child certainly does not have this disease now but is only an XXY male, in 100 percent of the cases I have worked with, we have won. At the Alliance of Genetic Support Groups meeting last year, the geneticists all pushed this concept of how important it is to understand that a genetic anomaly may predispose someone to a disease but there is no guarantee they will get it in this day or age. They were vocal to say that it is unnecessary for families, insurance companies, and individuals to assume they have the disease with such a fatalistic attitude.
Another reason this is interesting is that there are individuals who are XXY/XX mosaic. They are more phenotypically female than male. Only males can have Klinefelter syndrome. Yet these women are XXY, but do not have Klinefelter syndrome. When a doctor makes the erroneous assumption that a karyotype of XXY is Klinefelter syndrome, he can endanger these lives by ordering testosterone replacement therapy. It is the same with Turner's syndrome, an endocrinological condition only females have. Those who are born XO are susceptible to this, but I can tell you that not all women who are XO have Turner's syndrome, and not all are dxed. I have a report of three women, a mom and 2 sisters being identified at NIH for the first time, and that by accident. None had Turner's syndrome, and yet they were all XO/XX mosaic. Then, there are men who are XO/XY mosaic. They cannot possibly have Turner's syndrome. So we have been learning from cutting edge geneticists that the best practice is identifying newborns and individuals with the anomaly not any of the resulting diseases, conditions, or syndromes to which they may be at a more increased risk to develop. Again, this is life saving in the area of insurance. This is what they are trying to educate the rest of the medical community on -- I admit here in the South it is really slow to make the changes. I only know a lot of this because I have been fortunate enough to have the opportunity to sit on genetic boards and councils and to meet with, hear from, and talk with some of the leading geneticists in the country. At one time, I did not know or understand the difference. But now that I see the great damage the medical community does to individuals by not knowing or understanding the difference, the more passionate I become about educating them.
We know anecdotally the abortion rate is up because doctors tell moms their baby has Klinefelter syndrome, which again is an impossibility. The moms listen to the doctors making these dire predictions and explaining Klinefelter syndrome, read all the literature, look at the pictures, and even read the new literature until it scares them into believing they are carrying a monster. There is an older geneticist I know who still uses the older terminology. What he has to say about Klinefelter syndrome is true to a degree for a percentage of the population. What he did not understand or communicate is that the young children he sees do not have even that close a dire prediction because they are XXY or a variant, and do not have Klinefelter syndrome! Interventions may mean they will never develop Klinefelter syndrome. Today, one mom has so beautifully made us rejoice with her story of how interventions have saved her XXXY son and made a difference. There are NO standard predictions that can be made about XXY or variants. ALL they ALL have in common is extra sex chromosomes, and even that varies as some have mosaicism and some have more chromosomes than others. Nothing else affects every one of them. Anyway, you tell a pregnant mom her child does not have Klinefelter syndrome and you explain all of this and you can hear the change in her voice. She has great hope! Gone are the visions of the pictures of Klinefelter syndrome that danced in her head and gave her nightmares! And they write and call us and tell us they are keeping their babies and they never regret it.
It is true, there may be challenges and risks, and no one can guarantee anything. My son does not have Klinefelter syndrome, but he does have a more serious disorder the X may well have predisposed him to have that is a challenge. You will read here of other children who are XXY and who do not have Klinefelter syndrome, but the X may have predisposed them to have learning challenges or other challenges or conditions. There is hope though because just as there are interventions and treatments for Klinefelter syndrome, so we know there are for almost all of the other conditions your son may or may not develop. There are no guarantees that an early dx or early interventions will work or that an XXY will have no problems whatsoever. But then, with what child is there one? Enjoy your son as your son first. That is who and what he is that is of the most importance. Regards! Carol
Return to the Letters
Bottom |